The low variety in unique cultures and models is almost certainly becuase of lack of time to work on Attila. And more.Īlso many factions have no unique representation, for example the Brittons, the Nomads (as they are depicted, generic asian nomads), I hear that the Africans and Arabians share a roster of "desert units" but I'm not entirely sure.Īs we see above a massive downfall since Rome II. Units (Tagmata, Menualatoi and I hear Varangians), generic Limitanei represented only as a low tier spear unit. A few examples of anachronistic or non existing units are: Germanic Phalangites, All the "dessert units", middle age era east Roman The rosters are way weirder, making factions unique at the price of going beyond historical plausability. I hear there are quite a lot of visual inaccuracies, some pieces of shields and helmets never being used and also a tiny variety in helmets. However the real innaccuracy is in how factions are depicted, not what factions are depicted. I think they represented the eras factions ok when it comes to whom they are. The Ostrogoths for example certainly didn't exist in 395 yet they are playable, the Sassanid Empire is a lot of states instead of one (More understandable for the Seleucids as they had several independently ruling satraps), three minor Norse Peoples are regional powers in North-West Europe, a few of the steppe factions are innacurate I hearĪnd a few of the Roman succesor states are very implausible (nice concept I say but really Italia?). The factions were almost all based on reality, of the playable factions only the Suebi and Iceni may not have existed at the start of the game.Īnd then we look at Attila, when it comes to factions it is of course better than Rome I but still not as accurate as the games mentioned above. Certainly better then Shogun and Rome II.Ĭulminating in Rome II where CA depicted more unique cultures than in any previous game (and fairly accurate most of the time). I'd say one of the best Tw3 engine games. where is the evidence of this?Īttila Total War seems to have great gameplay, great immersion and is often very good looking. It seems even the huns have little women running around. Please tell me where the evidence for female warriors is apart from in sagas that had dragons, gods, valyries, giants etc as well or were just defending their migration carts or close to the migration. because it was in another thread I doubt it. I am hoping the original person who was talking about female warriors will come and answer me here. Not straying too far from the migratory pack.
Most of what I know about women fighting in the great migrations was that of defending the carts and convoys from attack.
I am happy to learn as this era is not my forte. Please do not show it to me in the form of sagas that also had dragons, valkyries, gods and magic in them. This is also why Swedish women will buy a guy a beer in bars.Please show me the proof. Germanic tribes migrating West would mobilize every able bodied fighter regardless of age or sex. You guys realize that women fighting in Germanic warbands is entirely historical right?
0 kommentar(er)
